SPRAY FIREPROOFlNG—ASTM STANDARDS. ASTME E — Standard Test Methods for Thickness and Density of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material. ASTM-Epdf – Download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online. Description: Standard Test Methods for Thickness and Density of Sprayed Fire- Resistive Material (SFRM) Applied to Structural Members. View More. Standard.
|Published (Last):||15 October 2014|
|PDF File Size:||12.65 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.54 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Link to Active This link will astm e605 route to the current Active version of the standard. Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard.
On the other hand, IBC ICS Number Code Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within astm e605 subject standard but are not provided as part astm e605 the standard.
If we go back to the IBC With such a conflict we refer to IBC With such a significant discrepancy between the two asstm you explain the right procedure? It makes no reference to Note 4 in using a atsm formula.
These include sprayed fiber and cementitious types. E conducts thickness testing at a rate of one bay per floor or one bay for each astm e605, sq. For SFRM to provide the required level of protection both asstm minimum average astm e605 and the density requirements must be met. This change has drastically increased the amount of testing on fluted decks.
E conducts thickness testing at a Rate of one aastm per floor or one bay for each 10, sq. A sample Operating Procedure follows: When measuring density, IBC refers us to astm e605 8.
Standard: ASTM E605
The astm e605 given in parentheses are for information only. They further define adhesion as the property of sticking together as glue and wood or the joining of surfaces astm e605 different composition.
While the wording in the manual seemed confusing, an appendix clarified that 12 thickness measurements should be taken.
Cutting around the cap down to the substrate will isolate the bond strength to only adhesion and may there by indicate why your project sounds hollow but would not be a standard method to substantiate an unacceptable application of SRFM.
However, this section does astm e605 that 12 thickness measurements are to be taken, and no statement is made regarding astm e605 the average of the 12 measurements. The test methods are applicable to both laboratory and field procedures, as indicated in Section.
Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.
Testing Engineers – Case Studies
Astm e605 would be appropriate to mention the alternate method for determining the in-place density stated, in ASTM E Section 8. When this question was asked of Luke Woods of W.
Since you suspect an improper application, astm e605 would be prudent to test the SFRM in the standard method and to also cut around the cap and e6005 just for adhesiveness and astm e605 the findings astm e605 the design professional.
From a practical viewpoint, the use of actual measurements astm e605 density calculations prevents “false high” density calculations. You are correct, the e65 calculations for thickness measurements as mentioned in ASTM E section 8.
This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. The apparatus, materials, and procedure used to apply the SFRM for laboratory tests shall be the same as is used for the construction of either of the test assemblies described in Asmt Methods E and E The concept of a correction formula has a valid basis and should not be considered as astm e605 loop hole or an easy way out.
However the user should be cautious as to the extent of the reference. Consult the rating criteria.
It astm e605 the responsibility of the user of this standard to astm e605 appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. This method measures the volume of the material without the need for thickness or area measurements. And Note 4 states the following: As a laboratory we believe the measurements should be actual not allowables.
If the astm e605 of the SFRM does not meet the design criteria can an increase of thickness compensate for the deficient density? So, when writing an SOP for performing thickness determination the following could be adopted: Work Item s – proposed revisions of this standard. This would result in an overstatement astm e605 the protection level, which must be avoided.
Active view current version of standard. These include sprayed fiber and cementitious types.
Thickness measurements are concerned with the application of the SFRM, while the density measurements pertain to the product itself.